97 | 0 | 152 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 基于有效性验证工作经验,检验肺结核专科护理质量评价体系运用效果。方法 于2021年10月—2022年5月,采用便利取样法对华北、东北、华中、华南、西南、西北6个地区8家结核病定点收治单位护理单元展开4轮测评,从信度检验、效度检验2个方面对每轮测评结果进行统计分析。结果 参与现场测评的护理单元共21个,测评表有效回收率为96.15%。其中结构、过程与结果质量维度的Cronbach′s α系数分别为0.756~0.800、0.729~0.785和0.634~0.679;重测信度为0.671~1.000;各条目内容效度为0.783~1.000,量表水平内容效度为0.958;整个评价体系模型拟合指标均方根残差为0.063。结论 肺结核专科护理质量评价体系具有较好的科学严谨性与实用可测性,可为结核病专科护理质量评价提供参考依据。
Abstract:Objective To test the application effect of the evaluation system for nursing quality in pulmonary tuberculosis specialty based on the experience of effectiveness verification.Methods From October 2021 to May 2022, a convenient sampling method was used to carry out four rounds of on-site evaluation on 8 designated tuberculosis treatment units and related nursing units in six major regions of North China, Northeast China, Central China, South China, Southwest China and Northwest China. The results of each round of evaluation were statistically analyzed from two aspects of reliability test and validity test.Result A total of 21 specialized nursing units participated in the on-site evaluation, and the effective recovery rate of the evaluation form was 96.154%. Cronbach's α coefficients for the dimensions of structure, process, and result quality were 0.756-0.800, 0.729-0.785, and 0.634-0.679, respectively. The range of retest reliability values was 0.671-1.000; The content validity of each item ranged from 0.783 to 1.000, and the content validity of scale was 0.958; The root mean square residual value of the entire evaluation system model fitting index was 0.063. Conclusion The evaluation system of nursing quality for pulmonary tuberculosis specialty has good scientific preciseness and practical measurability, which can provide reference for the evaluation of nursing quality of tuberculosis.
[1] 谢芳晖,梁丽,赵霞,等.肺结核患者痰标本采集的研究进展[J].中国防痨杂志,2022,44(9):978-982.
[2] 朱春英.细节管理模式在肺结核病人护理管理中的应用效果探讨[J].中国卫生产业,2015,12(15):178-179.
[3] 国家卫生健康委.国家卫生健康委关于印发《全国护理事业发展规划(2021-2025年)》的通知[EB/OL].(2022-04-29)[2023-12-25].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-05/09/content_5689354.htm?eqid=fdc0fcdc000531c60000000564740027.
[4] ZUMLA A,IPPOLITO G,NTOUMI F,et al.Host-directed therapies and holistic care for tuberculosis[J].The Lancet.Respiratory Medicine,2020,8(4):337-340.
[5] 安静.整体护理在耐多药结核病护理中的应用效果[J].中国医药指南,2021(1):161-162.
[6] DONABEDIAN A.The quality of medical care:A concept in search of a definition[J].Journal of Family Practice,1979,9(2):277-284.
[7] 操静,温敏,彭媛媛,等.肺结核专科护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2023,33(4):14-20.
[8] 孙贺群.基于有效性验证经验的美国早期教育质量评价的元评价研究[J].四川师范大学学报(社会科学版),2018,45(3):69-77.
[9] 张友恒,周双玥,程宏燕.马克思主义的实证方法和科学理性研究[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,25(Z2):5-9.
[10] 广东省卫生健康委员会.广东省卫生健康委办公室关于印发《三级医院评审标准(2020年版)广东省专科医院实施细则》的通知[EB/OL].(2021-08-13)[2021-11-08].https://wsjkw.gd.gov.cn/zwgk_zwwgk_zxgk/content/post_3627923.html.
[11] BARTLETT M S.Tests of significance in factor analysis[J].British Journal of Psychology,1950,3(2):77-85.
[12] KAISER H.A second generation little jiffy[J].Psychometrika,1970,35(4):401-415.
[13] 郭金花,吴星,唐玉露,等.高中生化学高阶思维结构的测量模型研究——基于探索性和验证性因子分析[J].化学教学,2019,(11):13-19.
[14] 颜佳冉,吾超,贺世喆,等.基于CiteSpace的我国专科护理质量指标研究可视化分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(5):61-65.
[15] 张晓路,李睿,高鑫,等.基于离散选择实验测量健康效用的方法学研究[J].中国循证医学杂志,2024,24(12):1442-1450.
[16] 史静琤,莫显昆,孙振球.量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(2):152-155.
[17] MCFADDEN K L,STOCK G N,GOWEN C R 3rd.Leadership,safety climate,and continuous quality improvement:Impact on process quality and patient safety[J].The Journal of Nursing Administration,2014,44(S1):S27-S37.
[18] 崔颖,席修明.医院患者安全文化调查问卷在北京市医疗机构中的适用性研究[J].中国初级卫生保健,2022,36(8):22-26.
[19] 曲冠楠,接园,陈劲,等.有意义的创新:概念维度、结构测量与绩效影响[J].管理评论,2023,35(7):86-95.
[20] 尚文涵,张海燕,么莉,等.护理专业医疗质量控制指标(2020年版)的构建[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(6):66-69,74.
基本信息:
DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2025.07.014
中图分类号:R473.5
引用信息:
[1]温敏,操静,彭媛媛等.肺结核专科护理质量评价体系有效性验证的实证研究[J].护士进修杂志,2025,40(07):756-761.DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2025.07.014.
基金信息:
深圳市科技计划基础研究(自由探索)项目(编号:JCYJ20180228163840098); 深圳市第三人民医院临床研究课题项目(编号:G2022001); 广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(编号:A2021265)